Post by a***@yahoo.co.ukKJ765
T74
86432
-
5 card majors, 15-17NT.
Partner opens 1H, North passes. What do you bid?
and I've been arguing for Pass, followed by a rebid in hearts, with
most other posters disagreeing with me]
Post by a***@yahoo.co.ukYou do realise that as the cards lie you can make 13 tricks in hearts?
Not that I would expect anyone to bid this, but getting to 6 is not
that unreasonable, though unlikely after a raise to 2H. You seem to
think the responding hand is weak. I could not play with anyone who
could not raise to 2H, even with a stiff club, let alone a void. I
suspect Douggie feels the same. Did you notice that not one poster
even considered a pass apart from you?
I think the responding hand is weak in high cards. It has only a King
and a Jack. The distribution is excellent, but it's important to let
partner know whether our bid is based on high card strength or
distribution (so that they can get a more accurate picture of what to
do). In this case, it's pure distribution, and so we pass on our first
chance to call to show that. We'll get another, and we can bid hearts
then. Pass now doesn't mean pass forever.
Think of it a bit like a relay system. You don't necessarily have to
show your hand on your first bid when you can show it more descriptively
in two bids (an immediate raise to show high card strength, a
pass-then-raise to show distribution without high card strength). The
odds of the opponents passing are very low (there's around a 7%
chance of missing game as the result of a pass, and 2% chance
of missing slam as a result of the pass, according to my calculations
earlier). When the opponents intervene on our right, we have a "free
call" which can be a pass or free bid, giving us more options to explain
what our hand is like; almost every bidding system I know will use Pass
for some hands that are actually quite strong (typically hands with
length mostly in the opposing suit). However, it's not just when
there's a bid on your right that the hand keeps going rather than
passing out. If your partner bid this round, an upcoming bid on your
left stops the hand passing out just as well as a bid on your right
does. So the only real issue is to ensure you'll get a bid there, which
there almost certainly will be when we have a distributional hand with
a fit for partner and our RHO couldn't manage a bid.
Post by a***@yahoo.co.ukOne curious point about your post: if partner passes the opening bid
and opener Xs a 2D bid and this gets raised to 3D, why do you suddenly
feel the responding hand is now worth a heart bid when you could not
even dredge up a simple raise. Opener's x of 2D does not show a
stronger hand, just shape. If you bid 3H with me, I would pass because
there is NO WAY I could pick you for these values.
It's the opponents' diamond bids that show our hand is strong, not the
partner's double. We have five weak diamonds. If both opponents have
diamonds too, then opener probably has a void, which suddenly gets rid
of a lot of losers from our hand. (It's unlikely that all five cards
would end up being losers, but highly plausible that 3 or 4 of them
were. So an overcall in diamonds or spades makes our hand the
equivalent of about nine points better, taking it from "probably able
to make a partscore" to "worth investigating slam".) The opponents would
hardly be bidding and raising a minor unless they collectively had eight
cards in the suit, unless they're particularly unusual psychers. You
have the other five. (Opposing bids in spades would also improve our
hand, but not by as much as the partner's void would make our honours
worthless.) With a bid of diamonds from the opponents, I'm bidding at
least 3H. With a bid and raise, I'm bidding game.
You seem to be acting like "values" of a hand is one thing, but really
hands have two sets of values; high cards, and distribution. If you bid
2H with either, how is your partner ever going to be able to tell the
difference between a 3334 with a couple of Kings and a 5350 with almost
no honours to speak of? You're not going to be able to have partner
help you make a decision if you can't show them what you have. A
sensible system needs to be able to distinguish between the cases, and
you can't use a bid like 2H for both of them. It's almost universal
that raises of a non-weak bid, outside competition, are based
primarily on high card strength (you don't raise an opening 1H to 3H
just because you have 4 hearts, or 4H just because you have five, if
your RHO passes). However, once competition has started, raises
normally do show distribution rather than high card strength (with
conventional bids like double or 2NT being used to show hands which
are high-card strong rather than distributional). So why would you not
wait for competition to start, thus changing the meaning of your bid
to the meaning you actually want, before making it?
--
ais523