Discussion:
Opening 1NT with a singleton
(too old to reply)
u***@yahoo.com
2007-05-07 13:17:48 UTC
Permalink
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor

They suggest opening 1NT with this hand:

Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x

One of their concerns is rebid problems.

My question is this:

What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?

1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?

Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
richard_willey@hotmail.com
2007-05-07 16:10:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands that would open 1NT with a singleton?
A few years back, I had the opportunity to discuss this issue with
Bobby Goldman over dinner. Bobby believed that there are an number of
5-4-3-1 and 4-4-4-1 patterns that should be opening with 15-17 HCP 1NT
opening. The most salient point about the different hands is that
they present a nasty rebid problem after the auction 1m - (p) - 1M

S K
H KJT4
D AQ84
C KT73

would be a representative example, as would

S K
H KJT3
D AQ873
C KT4

Neither of these hands has a reasonable rebid after 1D - (p) - 1S
Stu Goodgold
2007-05-07 17:44:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x
One of their concerns is rebid problems.
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
A "world international master"? Does he have a name or do you want to
avoid attributing this advice to anyone?

As Richard Willey posted, opening 1NT with a stiff is rare but decent
practice when you will have a rebid problem if you don't.

With the posted hand, there is little incentive to open 1NT. The hand
is suit oriented with the prime values and 6331 dist. Your main
problem after 1D - 1S will be whether to bid 2D or 3D; it would help
to know the spot cards. Most likely, I would opt for 3D because your
SK will be a working honor. If the bidding goes 1D - 1H you have
another decision.

I doubt too many experts will open this one 1NT, though you could
certainly find a few who will.

-Stu Goodgold
San Jose, CA
ted
2007-05-07 18:18:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stu Goodgold
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x
One of their concerns is rebid problems.
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
A "world international master"? Does he have a name or do you want to
avoid attributing this advice to anyone?
Yes, He has a name and while advocating opening 1NT from this hand he
suggested he would be ducking lighting bolts fired at him from Edgar
Kaplan. If you read some of the other threads you will find it.
Post by Stu Goodgold
As Richard Willey posted, opening 1NT with a stiff is rare but decent
practice when you will have a rebid problem if you don't.
With the posted hand, there is little incentive to open 1NT. The hand
is suit oriented with the prime values and 6331 dist. Your main
problem after 1D - 1S will be whether to bid 2D or 3D; it would help
to know the spot cards. Most likely, I would opt for 3D because your
SK will be a working honor. If the bidding goes 1D - 1H you have
another decision.
I doubt too many experts will open this one 1NT, though you could
certainly find a few who will.
-Stu Goodgold
San Jose, CA- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
u***@yahoo.com
2007-05-07 18:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Stu Goodgold
A "world international master"? Does he have a name or do you want to
avoid attributing this advice to anyone?
All I meant was the person is a real expert, not just someone who
likes to talk. I am not mentioning his name as its unimportant. Not
all experts agree. I want the focus on the question, not the person.
raija d
2007-05-08 00:50:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
Post by Stu Goodgold
A "world international master"? Does he have a name or do you want to
avoid attributing this advice to anyone?
All I meant was the person is a real expert, not just someone who
likes to talk. I am not mentioning his name as its unimportant. Not
all experts agree. I want the focus on the question, not the person.
And you know he is a real expert? How?

Not all experts agree so what is your intention in eliciting expert-only
responses?
Not all experts and - my guess - not even a majority of them, read this
newsgroup.
ted
2007-05-08 02:27:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by raija d
Post by u***@yahoo.com
Post by Stu Goodgold
A "world international master"? Does he have a name or do you want to
avoid attributing this advice to anyone?
All I meant was the person is a real expert, not just someone who
likes to talk. I am not mentioning his name as its unimportant. Not
all experts agree. I want the focus on the question, not the person.
And you know he is a real expert? How?
And I know that you know he is an expert. And I can see you miss some
of the threads on here ;-)
Post by raija d
Not all experts agree so what is your intention in eliciting expert-only
responses?
Not all experts and - my guess - not even a majority of them, read this
newsgroup.
c***@gmail.com
2007-05-08 22:11:45 UTC
Permalink
On May 7, 8:50 pm, "raija d" <***@charter.net> wrote:
Please feel free to ignore this discussion.
If you don't care to participate thats fine.
raija d
2007-05-09 01:41:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by c***@gmail.com
Please feel free to ignore this discussion.
If you don't care to participate thats fine.
Very kind of you to grant that permission:)
ted
2007-05-07 18:19:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x
One of their concerns is rebid problems.
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
Not any! should be the A or K otherwise down grade the hand
appropriately
Post by u***@yahoo.com
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
Phil
2007-05-07 18:43:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
One criterion is your partner is a total beginner and you want to make
sure you become declarer as often as possible. Opening 1NT lets you
accomplish that. Of course that's not being a "real" expert...
Wayne
2007-05-07 20:58:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x
One of their concerns is rebid problems.
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
My views and style are not standard but here they are anyway.

We open 1NT on any hand in range that will create rebid problems and
is within one-card of balanced.

Hands with singletons include:

1=4=4=4 or 4=4=4=1 any singleton

4=1=4=4 or 4=4=1=4 usually a singleton honour - although I opened with
a small singleton on Sunday (actually not in my regular partnership so
no real agreement there). Note with a red singleton it is easier to
open 1C and then rebid a major after a response in your short suit.

Some 5-4-3-1s with a singleton honour or a weak five-card suit or
where the four-card suit is higher ranking and the five-card suit only
moderate in strength. Almost never though with both majors but I
guess something like AKxx Jxxxx K Qxx might inspire 1NT from me. (Weak
NT)

6m-3-3-1 with a poor suit or a singleton honour

Wayne
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-08 15:46:05 UTC
Permalink
Not an answer, I'm afraid, but another question on the same lines. What
about overcalls?

The other day, I received this hand at pairs, they vulnerable we not:

S: AQJ
H:Kxxxx
D:AQJx
C: x

Unfortunately RHO opens 1H. Would you bid and, if so, what? Can you
overcall 1NT (showing 15-17 in our system) with a singleton? I thought not.
Partner thought I should have taken some action with 17 pts and 1NT was the
least lie.

If you do pass initially, what do you do if partner bids 2C and RHO rebids
2H?

Keith
Adam Beneschan
2007-05-08 17:43:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Not an answer, I'm afraid, but another question on the same lines. What
about overcalls?
S: AQJ
H:Kxxxx
D:AQJx
C: x
Unfortunately RHO opens 1H. Would you bid and, if so, what? Can you
overcall 1NT (showing 15-17 in our system) with a singleton? I thought not.
Partner thought I should have taken some action with 17 pts and 1NT was the
least lie.
I'd certainly consider it. I believe experts are more willing to
consider *overcalling* 1NT with a small outside singleton than opening
1NT. It may depend on the heart x's: if your suit is K5432, you
really only have one stopper, which would deter some players from a
1NT overcall despite the length.

-- Adam
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-09 09:35:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Adam Beneschan
It may depend on the heart x's: if your suit is K5432
Actually it was K9732

Keith
Adam Beneschan
2007-05-09 19:27:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Post by Adam Beneschan
It may depend on the heart x's: if your suit is K5432
Actually it was K9732
That makes a big difference since it's at least two stoppers in their
suit.

-- Adam
Derek Broughton
2007-05-08 18:58:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Not an answer, I'm afraid, but another question on the same lines. What
about overcalls?
S: AQJ
H:Kxxxx
D:AQJx
C: x
Unfortunately RHO opens 1H. Would you bid and, if so, what? Can you
overcall 1NT (showing 15-17 in our system) with a singleton? I thought
not. Partner thought I should have taken some action with 17 pts and 1NT
was the least lie.
I've got less problem with a singleton for a 1N overcall than for an
opening. For practically any other distribution - and the same point
count - I'd rather double.
--
derek
Kieran Dyke
2007-05-09 00:09:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Not an answer, I'm afraid, but another question on the same lines. What
about overcalls?
S: AQJ
H:Kxxxx
D:AQJx
C: x
Unfortunately RHO opens 1H. Would you bid and, if so, what? Can you
overcall 1NT (showing 15-17 in our system) with a singleton? I thought
not. Partner thought I should have taken some action with 17 pts and 1NT
was the least lie.
If you do pass initially, what do you do if partner bids 2C and RHO rebids
2H?
Keith
I prefer pass, but don't consider the 1NT overcall forbidden by the
singleton. This hand is very suited to suit contracts.

If I pass and the auction proceeds as specified, I double and hope to retire
on the proceeds (it's not a responsive double unless they have bid and
raised. If it's pulled I try my luck in 3NT.

Tiggrr
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-09 09:43:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kieran Dyke
If I pass and the auction proceeds as specified, I double
and hope to retire on the proceeds
I think 2H* would be a good result. I considered it but wasn't confident
partner would take it as primarily penalty oriented at this stage. I also
misplayed it and only took it one off.

Partner's club bid is based on clubs alone, six of them headed by AQ. I
don't think 3NT would work out well because there's only one entry to
partner's hand and that assumes you don't take the (doomed) club finesse.

If you are interested in the full deal it's board 15 at
http://greathollands.bracknellbridge.com/pairs_b.htm. I see the top was
5D*+2 our way. If you are mystified by the +2, I believe there was a
revoke.

Keith
e***@hotmail.com
2007-05-09 06:04:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Not an answer, I'm afraid, but another question on the same lines. What
about overcalls?
S: AQJ
H:Kxxxx
D:AQJx
C: x
Unfortunately RHO opens 1H. Would you bid and, if so, what? Can you
overcall 1NT (showing 15-17 in our system) with a singleton? I thought not.
Partner thought I should have taken some action with 17 pts and 1NT was the
least lie.
Why are you compelled to bid just because you have 17 hcp?
A 1NT overcall shows a specific type of hand which you don't have.
Also, how do you know the opponents aren't going to get into trouble
if you just pass?
Post by Keith Sheppard
If you do pass initially, what do you do if partner bids 2C and RHO rebids
2H?
If you have to ask, you don't deserve this 17 hcp hand.
Aren't you the least bit curious about RHO's 2H bid and express some
sort of opinion that he is at least an underdog or worse to make 2H?
If you have any reservations about your defensive card play one would
think now is the time to practice.

Eric Leong
Post by Keith Sheppard
Keith
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-09 09:58:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Why are you compelled to bid just because you have 17 hcp?
I didn't feel compelled to bid and, indeed, didn't. I was really looking
for reassurance that this was justified.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
If you have to ask, you don't deserve this 17 hcp hand.
There are probably a lot of things I don't deserve but I'm not totally
convinced that mediocre players don't deserve ever to receive good hands.
If we don't, how are we ever going to improve?

Keith
e***@hotmail.com
2007-05-10 22:50:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Why are you compelled to bid just because you have 17 hcp?
I didn't feel compelled to bid and, indeed, didn't. I was really looking
for reassurance that this was justified.
Post by e***@hotmail.com
If you have to ask, you don't deserve this 17 hcp hand.
There are probably a lot of things I don't deserve but I'm not totally
convinced that mediocre players don't deserve ever to receive good hands.
If we don't, how are we ever going to improve?
Well it is a matter of counting.
You can estimate two spade tricks, two diamond tricks, and the heart
king, and a club ruff.
Surely, partner can contribute a trick or two also. I am not positive
of down three but I think down two is very possible when our side can
make much of anything.
Further, you have an easy club lead.

Basically, not doubling 2H is the equivalent of being alchemist that
can turn a hand of gold into a piece of crap.

Eric Leong
Post by Keith Sheppard
Keith
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-11 12:42:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Basically, not doubling 2H is the equivalent of being alchemist
that can turn a hand of gold into a piece of crap.
I agree. Unfortunately my fear (confirmed in subsequent discussion with
partner) was that in the sequence:
1H P P
2C 2H double

The double would be taken as take-out.

This particular bear of little brain finds the whole penalty/takeout double
business a real headache. I started a discussion thread on the topic on
this forum a few months back. The piece of advice I latched onto then was
"a double is for takeout unless and until our side have agreed a suit". I
agree that's probably over simplistic but I wanted a simple rule because,
even if the rule was wrong, I reckoned that was safer than risking one
partner thinking a double was for penalties and the other not, or vice
versa.

My previous rule (plagiarised from the Standard English convention card) was
that doubles of suit bids up to and including 2S are for takeout.

By both yardsticks, the above double is for takeout so how does one achieve
2H* on this hand - or do I still have more to learn on the "when is a
double for penalties" front? If so, what guideline would cover this case?

Keith
Andrew
2007-05-11 17:12:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Basically, not doubling 2H is the equivalent of being alchemist
that can turn a hand of gold into a piece of crap.
I agree. Unfortunately my fear (confirmed in subsequent discussion with
1H P P
2C 2H double
The double would be taken as take-out.
This particular bear of little brain finds the whole penalty/takeout double
business a real headache. I started a discussion thread on the topic on
this forum a few months back. The piece of advice I latched onto then was
"a double is for takeout unless and until our side have agreed a suit". I
agree that's probably over simplistic but I wanted a simple rule because,
even if the rule was wrong, I reckoned that was safer than risking one
partner thinking a double was for penalties and the other not, or vice
versa.
My previous rule (plagiarised from the Standard English convention card) was
that doubles of suit bids up to and including 2S are for takeout.
By both yardsticks, the above double is for takeout so how does one achieve
2H* on this hand - or do I still have more to learn on the "when is a
double for penalties" front? If so, what guideline would cover this case?
Keith
Here is another simple guideline: low-level doubles are for takeout
when doubler sits in front of the suit bidder and for penalty when he
sits behind the suit bidder. Examples:

1C-P-1H-2S
P-P-X

A takeout double showing extra high cards and no clear choice of
strain. For example: xx, AKxx, xxxx, Kxx.


1C -1S - P- P
2C - 2S - X

Penalty double because doubler is sitting behind the suit bidder. Note
also that in this sequence doubler had a chance to make a takeout
double the round before (which he did not do) so it is clear the later
double is for penalty.

The justification for this guideline is simple. When you sit behind
the long suit, you need much less in their suit to justify an attempt
to penalize. QTxx in trumps could be two tricks behind the overcaller
and no tricks in front of the overcaller. There are exceptions to this
guideline. For example:

1C - 1S - X - 2S
P - P - X

the second double is for takeout under the reasoning that having made
one double for takeout already, your second double should also be for
takeout. Further, when the opponents have bid and raised their suit,
you again would need a very strong trump holding to justify a penalty
double and you won't have it often.

More examples
1C - 1S - 1NT - 2S
P - P - X
Since the oppos have bid and raised spades, this double should show
cards.

1C - 1S - 1NT - P
P - 2S - X

This double can be for penalty.


On the original sequence, its reasonable to define the double either
way. Responder has not had a chance to show general values earlier in
the auction and he might want to now. OTOH, responder is behind the
doubler where he does not need much stuff to beat them.
* Double for takeout will be nice when you hold: ATxx, xx, KQxxx, xx
* Double for penalty will be nice when you hold AKx, QTxx, Qxxx, xx

If you decide the double for takeout, then advancer can pass to
penalize and let the balancer balance again with a double. You may
miss a penalty occasionally, but at least you will still collect a
plus and your constructive bidding will be better because you have a
double to show values without a fit. Alternatively, if advancer thinks
game is too likely, he can bid 2NT or 3NT with a hand that was worth
penalizing. Again, assuming his judgment is accurate, at least you are
still going plus, even if you could not take home the big prize today.


Andrew
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-16 10:43:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andrew
Here is another simple guideline: low-level doubles are for takeout
when doubler sits in front of the suit bidder and for penalty when he
sits behind the suit bidder.
That's a useful indicator and a principle I've heard mentioned before.
Specifically, a penalty double sitting under declarer must be comparatively
rare. However there are times when sitting over declarer that a takeout
double is more useful than penalties. My difficulty is identifying those
situations and ensuring I'm on the same wavelength as partner.

Keith

e***@hotmail.com
2007-05-15 04:51:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith Sheppard
Post by e***@hotmail.com
Basically, not doubling 2H is the equivalent of being alchemist
that can turn a hand of gold into a piece of crap.
I agree. Unfortunately my fear (confirmed in subsequent discussion with
1H P P
2C 2H double
The double would be taken as take-out.
This particular bear of little brain finds the whole penalty/takeout double
business a real headache. I started a discussion thread on the topic on
this forum a few months back. The piece of advice I latched onto then was
"a double is for takeout unless and until our side have agreed a suit". I
agree that's probably over simplistic but I wanted a simple rule because,
even if the rule was wrong, I reckoned that was safer than risking one
partner thinking a double was for penalties and the other not, or vice
versa.
My previous rule (plagiarised from the Standard English convention card) was
that doubles of suit bids up to and including 2S are for takeout.
By both yardsticks, the above double is for takeout so how does one achieve
2H* on this hand - or do I still have more to learn on the "when is a
double for penalties" front? If so, what guideline would cover this case?
Keith
If you play against me at the table, I only think it is sporting for
you to please introduce yourself so at least I know I have diplomatic
immunity from low level penalty doubles.

Eric Leong
Keith Sheppard
2007-05-15 10:12:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@hotmail.com
If you play against me at the table, I only think it is sporting for
you to please introduce yourself so at least I know I have diplomatic
immunity from low level penalty doubles.
I live in hope that I will have got the hang of it before that day arrives
;)

Keith
David Stevenson
2007-05-16 01:42:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by e***@hotmail.com
If you play against me at the table, I only think it is sporting for
you to please introduce yourself so at least I know I have diplomatic
immunity from low level penalty doubles.
Well, Eric, you know me, and I love lots of takeout doubles.

Don't blame me when my partner and I pass them for penalties, though.
--
David Stevenson Bridge RTFLB Cats Railways
Liverpool, England, UK Fax: +44 870 055 7697 ICQ: 20039682
<***@blakjak.com> bluejak on OKB
Bridgepage: http://blakjak.com/brg_menu.htm
Substitute .org for .com else eddresses/URLs will fail this year
Chris Ryall
2007-05-10 06:38:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x
Yuk, here bidding diamonds is such a sensible alternative!
Post by u***@yahoo.com
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
I'll address this in my own way rather that stick to the script. While I
was developing some understanding of our game, I started calling my 1NT
very much to the books. I learned to loosen up. Roughly in order I
included ..

5 card minors (very early)
6 card minors
7 card minors (feeling quite brave now!)
5422 hands long minor
4441 singleton ace where I'd have to open a weak suit

Nothing seemed to happen apart from risk of transfer into my singleton

5 card majors. I experimented with 'either' on experience swung
to H>S in a ratio of 3:1 Spades are after all our boss suit!

After a while we made possible 5cM an agreement, and eg our transfer
breaks could show such 5cM support

OK why this preemble? Well I was scared of stiff kings, until I played a
friendly with old CUBC pal John Armstrong (a 'real' expert)

He did it opposite me holding K444. Nothing happened. I asked him a few
questions over our curry and thus learned to relax further.

I've now opened a good number of stiff kings (not by agreement), mostly
in majors. It nearly always works. I have to say that table feel is a
big factor. One reason I might do this is a SK holding in 3rd where 1NT
will pre-empt that suit, but the alternative 4cM '1H' call won't.

Do I get punished?

No, it works so long as partner doesn't transfer '2H'.

If I end up in no trumps a lead of a small spade isn't uncommon :)) I've
also had RHO shove a small spade through from Axxx 'to give me a guess'
:))))

So rebid problems are I think a factor, but chez moi it has more to do
with the game's dynamics. I've learned not to worry too much about doing
it. Sometimes the rest of the table don't even notice, eg if I can
declare '9 top ticks'
Post by u***@yahoo.com
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
Stiff Q is a similar gambit, same gain, more risk.

There are of course those straight psyches.
--
Chris Ryall Wirral UK <***@my.domain>
nige1
2007-05-10 07:21:40 UTC
Permalink
[usawargamer]
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
They suggest opening 1NT with S:K H:Axx D:AKxxxx Clubs:QTx
One of their concerns is rebid problems.
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
[nige1]
I don't claim to be an expert but I agree that you should consider
opening 1N even with a singleton honour (A K or at a stretch Q), if
you envisage rebid problems.

[A] S:K H:Axx D:AKxxxx Clubs:QTx seems a bad example for the reasons
given by Chris Ryall
(i) It contains a rebiddable suiit (Damonds).
(ii) The singleton is in a major. Do you really want to play in 2S
opposite say S:Jxxxx H:xxx D:Qxx C:xxx

IMO better examples are...
[B] S:AKJ H:Jxxxx D:K C:QTxx
[C] S:Qxxx H:Jxxx D:AKJx C:A
m***@googlemail.com
2007-05-10 12:45:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by u***@yahoo.com
On a couple of occasions I have seen an expert (World International
Master ) advocate opening 1NT on hands with a singleton honor
Spades: K
Hearts: A x x
Diamonds: A K x x x x
Clubs: Q T x
One of their concerns is rebid problems.
What types of hands will an expert (real expert) open 1NT with a
singleton? What are the criteria?
1 - stiff honor?
2 - in between hand that may have rebid problems?
Can you suggest some other hands taht would open 1NT with a singleton?
Well certainly not hands that have no rebid problem. This hand partner
bids 1S and you bid 2D. Hands that I might consider opening 1N with a
singleton with (which I think should be kept to an absolute minimum)
are 1444 and 1435 / 1453. After 1m - 1S you are a bit into trouble,
especially if your 5-card minor is K5432 or so and you lack reverse
strength.

Gerben
Loading...