p***@infi.net
2018-03-05 03:37:11 UTC
Khokan Bagchi posted this on Bridgewinners:
https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-ab5zzx79gw/?cj=621916#c621916
Dealer North, none vul, IMPs
.......P....P...1NT 15-17
3D..X....P....4D natural preempt, negative double, pick-a-major
P.....?
A875
K9874
4
754
The vote was 49-0 for 4!H; he bid 4!S at the table and found partner with:
KQJx
AQ10x
xx
Kxx
So 4!S (N) made, though a club lead would've beat it; 4!H had no play with the club Ace over the KIng. My instinct is that with this few hcp, the 9-card fit will make at least as often as the 4-4 and will be safer. I've long felt you needed to be close to slam for the 4-4 fit to be a better bet, but perhaps I've underestimated the value on hands such as this.
How about a single dummy sim? Double dummy looks useless since the defense would defeat even 4S (S) by underleading in diamonds.
If Kurt or anyone can help here, thanks!
https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-ab5zzx79gw/?cj=621916#c621916
Dealer North, none vul, IMPs
.......P....P...1NT 15-17
3D..X....P....4D natural preempt, negative double, pick-a-major
P.....?
A875
K9874
4
754
The vote was 49-0 for 4!H; he bid 4!S at the table and found partner with:
KQJx
AQ10x
xx
Kxx
So 4!S (N) made, though a club lead would've beat it; 4!H had no play with the club Ace over the KIng. My instinct is that with this few hcp, the 9-card fit will make at least as often as the 4-4 and will be safer. I've long felt you needed to be close to slam for the 4-4 fit to be a better bet, but perhaps I've underestimated the value on hands such as this.
How about a single dummy sim? Double dummy looks useless since the defense would defeat even 4S (S) by underleading in diamonds.
If Kurt or anyone can help here, thanks!